@Ulfra_Wolfe for me "aromantic" is too ill-defined (at least in my context) to use personally

all the descriptions of romance i see refer to sexuality, commitment, monogamy or certain shared activities

panromantic would be correct for me in the performative sense, but that's accidental

*sexual labels aren't much easier, but i also don't see this differently than any other activities you may enjoy but not everyone likes it or likes it done the same way or with you

Follow

@kiilas @Ulfra_Wolfe@witches.town

Certainly seems to describe stuff I've been saying about myself for awhile now...

(wiki.asexuality.org/WTFromanti)

· · Web · 0 · 1 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Toot.Cat

On the internet, everyone knows you're a cat — and that's totally okay.