@Ulfra_Wolfe [witches.town] for me "aromantic" is too ill-defined (at least in my context) to use personally
all the descriptions of romance i see refer to sexuality, commitment, monogamy or certain shared activities
panromantic would be correct for me in the performative sense, but that's accidental
*sexual labels aren't much easier, but i also don't see this differently than any other activities you may enjoy but not everyone likes it or likes it done the same way or with you
@Ulfra_Wolfe [witches.town] hey look what i found, that's totally me http://wiki.asexuality.org/WTFromantic
@kiilas @Ulfra_Wolfe@witches.town
Certainly seems to describe stuff I've been saying about myself for awhile now...