I saw elsewhere - perhaps Twitter - a criticism of the #cyberpunk idea, reflected in Cyberpunk 2077, that the unaltered human body is somehow sacred, and that augmenting it is profane. The criticism noted that this was, at its core, transphobic.

The critic then turned the idea on its head into a trans-positive cyberpunk that eschewed "humanity" in favor of "essence". Maybe one person's essence is complete when they're born; maybe another's essence is lacking until they augment themselves.

There are other deep criticisms of a view of #cyberpunk that insists that unaltered bodies are the only true humanity, too. E.g.: authors with this view tend to conflate increasing augmentation with a decrease in emotion, as though expressive emotion were innately human–never mind autistic people, people with flat affects, etc.

But I like the idea that the criticism offers - that augmentation allows a person to uncover their true self, rather than being limited by the body they were born with.

One thing I notice in replies is that many people associate this with cyberpunk RPGs, and reasonably so - as noted, it's a mechanic that lets people with enhancements maintain rough parity with people without them. (I think there are better ways to do this, but that's outside the scope.)

It does show up in the fiction, though, too; I'm thinking specifically of two examples, "The Man who Bites His Tongue" from "A.D. Police Files" and "Robocop" (the original).

It's worth noting that those examples have different approaches. "AD Police" has the title character begging for death because all the augmentation has made him inhuman. "Robocop" is more optimistic; the humanity has been actively programmed out of Murphy, and he regains it by the end of the movie.