"participants in the decentralized social web is so good at fighting each other that apparently we do that work for them.
But it doesn't have to be that way. You might be able to come to consensus on a good way forward. And if you can't come to consensus, you can at least have friendly and cooperative communication."
Looking at https://gnu.org/consensus
Maybe it should be renamed GNU ControVerse.
Quoting @rhiaro in http://rhiaro.github.io/thesis/chapter5#swwg-competing-specifications: (1/2)
"Eventually the Working Group as a whole acknowledged this, and resolved to move forward all of the prospective standards separately, and to stop trying to force convergence.
This decision was controversial in the eyes of other members of the wider W3C community who were not members of Social Web Working Group, and potentially confusing for developers looking for the solution to decentralised Social Web protocols."
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!