"It's OK if the number of secondary fediverse services¹ is much less than the number of accounts or the number of primary account services², as long as it's much more than one."
¹ for example: people search, text search, tag search, bridges, groups, reposters
² for example: Mastodon, Friendica, Pixelfed, Pleroma instances
@dredmorbius@evan I'm not understanding the question here, and feel as if I'm missing critical context.
@dredmorbius@evan A little bit?
"Some service accounts are OK, so long as they exist at all" being my attempted rephrase.
I'm ... still not sure what issue / problem this is addressing, if any.
@dredmorbius great! Feel free to skip the question and just go live your life. There will be another poll tomorrow!
@dredmorbius@evan My life goes on.
I figure you're aiming for something here, and in this case missing. But likewise.
@dredmorbius maybe! I'm talking about decentralisation theory and practice, and I'm not sure how important that is to you. It's really a specialist poll.
@dredmorbius I'll be happy to explain it further after the poll is over.
I try not to go too deep on the explanations of my polls, because I don't want to sway people one way or another.
@dredmorbius@toot.cat@evan Sure, I get that and run my own polls that way myself.
Talk after is good.