Equating "being innovative" and "having patents" is being intellectually lazy at best.

@liw This is a depressingly common metric in all kinds of analysis, particularly in economics.

I strongly suspect it's a case of "easy to measure" (tally up patent applications / assignments) trumping "meaningful measurement".

It's ... staggeringly close to measuring production by, oh say, "pieces of string produced" rather than measuring the length of the string(s).

The underlying problem is that measuring the value and/or significance of inventions is difficult. That said, the method you describe is really, really bad.

(I've spent way too much time looking for lists of / ways to assess "most significant inventions", and ... it's just a mess. That said ... yeah, stop with the bullshit.)


@lightweight This is actually an association which goes back far further than software.

Electronics, television and radio, the phonograph, the electric light, the telephone, the telegraph, and the steam engine were all greatly hampered by patent encumberances.


Sign in to participate in the conversation

On the internet, everyone knows you're a cat — and that's totally okay.